Hockey SA 2024 Senior Metroplitan Competition · Metro 5 Men
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Seacliff Hockey Club | 18 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 11 | 83 | 52 | 96% |
2. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 18 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 72 | 24 | 48 | 41 | 76% |
3. Adelaide Hockey Club | 18 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 54 | 40 | 14 | 35 | 65% |
4. University of South Australia Hockey Club | 18 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 43 | -11 | 31 | 57% |
5. Forestville Hockey Club | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33 | 38 | -5 | 30 | 56% |
6. North East Hockey Club | 18 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 36 | 54 | -18 | 19 | 35% |
7. Woodville Hockey Club | 18 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 38 | 44 | -6 | 18 | 33% |
8. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 18 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 28 | 58 | -30 | 14 | 26% |
9. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 18 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 18 | 54 | -36 | 11 | 20% |
10. St Peter's Old Collegians' Hockey Club | 18 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 23 | 62 | -39 | 11 | 20% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.