Hockey SA 2024 Senior Metroplitan Competition · Metro 3 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 11 | 107 | 54 | 100% |
| 2. Adelaide University Hockey Club | 18 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 77 | 23 | 54 | 45 | 83% |
| 3. Enfield Hockey Club | 18 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 66 | 42 | 24 | 36 | 67% |
| 4. Grange Royals Hockey Club | 18 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 44 | 37 | 7 | 35 | 65% |
| 5. Seacliff Hockey Club | 18 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 55 | 25 | 30 | 33 | 61% |
| 6. Adelaide Hockey Club | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 53 | 44 | 9 | 24 | 44% |
| 7. Burnside Hockey Club | 18 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 21 | 65 | -44 | 15 | 28% |
| 8. Woodville Hockey Club | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 25 | 88 | -63 | 12 | 22% |
| 9. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 18 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 16 | 74 | -58 | 9 | 17% |
| 10. Flinders University Hockey Club | 18 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 10 | 76 | -66 | 2 | 4% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.